« Settling into Valley Life | Main | Approaching 30 »
April 01, 2007
Blood Diamond: Good Movie, Poor Explanation of Africa
I saw Blood Diamond for the first time on Friday night. It was on my list of "I'd like to see it" around Oscar time, but this year I barely saw anything in the theatre. There were a few other things going on in my life, so I don't feel too guilty about that. Plus, I'm quite leery of movies with a political point. As a peace activist, I stay on top of world news and often understand situations beyond the simplistic way they're related in movies.
For example, Hotel Rwanda included kindly white religious folk who helped shelter potential genocide victims. This was in direct contradiction to the horrific story behind the title of "We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will be Killed With Our Families: Stories from Rwanda." In general, films on global issues created by US filmmakers tend to gloss over the role that white people have in creating/perpetuating the problem. Instead, white people are shown as saviors and their society's economic and political structure is what the non-European world should aspire to.
Blood Diamond did suffer a bit from white savior syndrome. In general, it was surprisingly good and much better than I anticipated. Even though I've enjoyed most of his recent movies, I was also leery of the film's star - Leo DiCaprio. I've been trying to figure out why I hated the guy so much. I think it started because he went to high school with my cousin and I heard he was obnoxious even before he got famous. And Titanic sealed my belief that he was just another pretty face. It's strange how you can hold onto prejudices long after they've been proven wrong.
As the paid critics noted in their reviews of the film, Leo has grown up - his face is broader, his voice is lower; he's more man than Titanic boy toy. And while I appreciated his accent, and enjoyed his unapologetic acts of random violence, I was bored by his extremely forced flirting with the doey-eyed white reporter. I was shocked that Jennifer Connelly's character seemed to lump all non-whites into a "victims for copy" category and only saw white men as virile enough to satisfy her desires. Is this still the 21st century?
The last half hour was the most disappointing - every Hollywood cliche was followed and everyone had to get their due. The morally pure simple black folk were saved by the generous white folk and given free passage out of Africa and into the morally superior land that is Britain. The whites saw the evil of their ways and created the Kimberly Process, through which all white women can pretend that conflict diamonds are no longer smuggled out of Africa.
Another amusing aspect to white Hollywood's portrayal of Africa is that the only people who exist in Hollywood Africa are really dark black people, pale white women, and sun-weathered white men. Apparently, explaining how Indians became part of the population, or the Chinese businessmen who support genocide in the name of oil, or Arabs would complicate matters too much.
One more quibble - in this, and most Hollywood portrayals of Africa, the entire continent is described as a unified place, sorta as big as a country and as homogeneous as one. Take the refrain "T.I.A." - this is Africa, which the white Africans repeat throughout the movie. As if the problems of Zimbabwe, South Africa, and Angola (southern African countries referenced by the white cast) are exactly the same as what's happening in Sierra Leone (the west African country where the movie is supposed to take place, even though it was entirely filmed in South Africa).
So now you know what's wrong with the movie. Yet, it still shines as a good Hollywood flick - violent adventure with a touch of morality, and visual portrayals of how to create child soldiers. The movie does a great job depicting a civil war where none of the sides are "white hats." DiCaprio captures the cold-hearted nature of a white man born in Africa with amazing precision. I believe it was his best performance of last year, although I still think The Departed was a better all-around movie.
Too bad Blood Diamond ends with Hollywood cliches and white saviour moments. It's worth watching, but doesn't rise above what it is: white filmmakers' interpretation of black Africa's connection to the white world of the diamond trade.
Rotten Tomatoes entry.
Ann Hornday's review in WaPo.
Ty Burr's review in the Boston Globe.
David Denby's review in The New Yorker.
A political map of Africa.
Posted by cj at April 1, 2007 06:40 AM